How PAR is measured on this tank, and what the numbers do and do not mean.
Published
Purpose
To make every PAR figure published on this site checkable. If the method is stated plainly, a reader can judge the numbers rather than take them on trust, and can repeat the survey on their own tank.
Background
Published PAR figures describe a fixture, usually on a grid at a stated height over open water. That is a fair way to characterize a light and a poor way to answer what a specific plant is receiving, because it does not know where the plant is or how deep its canopy sits. On a 90 cm tank lit by one pendant the distribution across the layout is the interesting part. Measuring underwater matters too: refraction and absorption mean an above-water reading is not the light the plant sees.
Methodology
01Measure with an Apogee MQ-510 underwater quantum sensor, reading PPFD in µmol/m²/s.
02Take readings at each numbered plant position, nineteen of the original twenty currently live, so surveys can be compared to each other.
03Hold the sensor level at the plant or substrate location, since small tilts change the reading materially.
04Measure mid-photoperiod with the aquarium light on and the ADA Shade fitted, since the shade is part of the fixture as run and every published reading includes it.
05Minimize room lighting and take readings only when the water is clear.
06Record depth and fixture height alongside every reading, since neither is implied by the number itself. The August 8th survey is the first to carry both on every reading, and is the one the published figures are drawn from. The two earlier runs predate the requirement in different ways: the 1st of August covered seventeen positions and carried depth and fixture height on all of them, while the 2nd covered all twenty and carried neither. Neither was both complete and reproducible, which is why the survey was re-run rather than corrected.
Observations
·Measured PPFD varies widely across the layout rather than tracking a single headline figure.
·The center of the tank reads substantially higher than the outer positions under one pendant fixture.
·Moving the fixture a small distance front-to-back changed the measured distribution noticeably.
·Raising the fixture appeared to reduce measured light at the ends rather than spreading it more evenly. The comparison readings were not preserved as a standalone survey, so this is recorded as an observation rather than a result.
Scope
·Instrument, sensor type and why underwater measurement is used
·The numbered plant positions and how they are located
·Conditions held constant between surveys
·Why a working range is not a biological threshold